This Monday night I went to Barbican Center to see the Exhibition mentioned earlier here.
Lots of single people there, maybe expecting to pull... and some couples, maybe expecting some eroticism/stimulation for when they arrived home... But, let me tell you that for anyone hoping for a turn on I am certain they will not be stimulated as much taking into account the material presented.
It tries to define the fine line between art and pornography, where one starts and the other ends.
The main thing that anyone gain from this Exhibition is the assurance that as many generation of the 60's, 70's whatever (or even now with sex so easy to get on the wide numbers of Adult Web Sites) think that they/we invented sex or took it to a new level end up pretty much reminded that it has all been done before in all corners of the planet for aaaaaagggeeessss.
The three main 'arts' that called my attention were a beautifull oil painting from the 18th century with a woman laying down, with her dress lifted up as a big bird comes close to her vagina (or pussy) for the modern talking.
The other was a little drawing from the 17th century with man in various phases of his life. each time he is shown chatting up a woman and a cartoon like ballon near his head shows at early life a violin (as he uses music to gain the woman) as time passes by the uses different tatics to gin this object of desire, with his penis always erect. However, by the time that he has lots of money (there is the bag of money marking 100 gold or something similar), it shows that his penis/cock can not get stiff anymore...
From the whole exhibition I was disappointed to see, considering it is art from the past 2,000 years that there were only 4 references to oral sex in woman (all the rest was oral sex performed on man or intercorse per si). One from the photo Porno Album of Ciciolina (famous for her porno movies in Italy). Two of these references were done by, bless him, Pablo Picasso (nao confuda a obra prima de Picasso, com a pica de aco do mestre de obras) with drawings/self-portrait and by KR Buxley’s “Requiem”, a give back to Warhol`s “Blowjob” with the difference that with 'Blowjob' the object (the man) hides behing a camara (this piece by Warhol was not on show by the way). Unlike him she doesn’t hide the object (the woman) behind the camera but is the object of the lens. Her face evokes the ecstasy. This is in part achieved by the film being accompanied by Faure`s 1888 requiem music. Then towards the end she looks down to her partner and thanks him, because obviously there is a man on his knees pleasuring her.
Lots of single people there, maybe expecting to pull... and some couples, maybe expecting some eroticism/stimulation for when they arrived home... But, let me tell you that for anyone hoping for a turn on I am certain they will not be stimulated as much taking into account the material presented.
It tries to define the fine line between art and pornography, where one starts and the other ends.
The main thing that anyone gain from this Exhibition is the assurance that as many generation of the 60's, 70's whatever (or even now with sex so easy to get on the wide numbers of Adult Web Sites) think that they/we invented sex or took it to a new level end up pretty much reminded that it has all been done before in all corners of the planet for aaaaaagggeeessss.
The three main 'arts' that called my attention were a beautifull oil painting from the 18th century with a woman laying down, with her dress lifted up as a big bird comes close to her vagina (or pussy) for the modern talking.
The other was a little drawing from the 17th century with man in various phases of his life. each time he is shown chatting up a woman and a cartoon like ballon near his head shows at early life a violin (as he uses music to gain the woman) as time passes by the uses different tatics to gin this object of desire, with his penis always erect. However, by the time that he has lots of money (there is the bag of money marking 100 gold or something similar), it shows that his penis/cock can not get stiff anymore...
From the whole exhibition I was disappointed to see, considering it is art from the past 2,000 years that there were only 4 references to oral sex in woman (all the rest was oral sex performed on man or intercorse per si). One from the photo Porno Album of Ciciolina (famous for her porno movies in Italy). Two of these references were done by, bless him, Pablo Picasso (nao confuda a obra prima de Picasso, com a pica de aco do mestre de obras) with drawings/self-portrait and by KR Buxley’s “Requiem”, a give back to Warhol`s “Blowjob” with the difference that with 'Blowjob' the object (the man) hides behing a camara (this piece by Warhol was not on show by the way). Unlike him she doesn’t hide the object (the woman) behind the camera but is the object of the lens. Her face evokes the ecstasy. This is in part achieved by the film being accompanied by Faure`s 1888 requiem music. Then towards the end she looks down to her partner and thanks him, because obviously there is a man on his knees pleasuring her.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário